[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5345382B.3050400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:38:11 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
On 04/09/2014 12:45 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
> Yes, I am able to reproduce the hang problem with ebizzy. BTW, could you
> try to apply the attached patch file on top of the v8 patch series to
> see if it can fix the hang problem?
Ran the benchmarks with the fix and I am not seeing hang so far.
ebizzy improvements.
0.5x 2.7345
1x -10.6593
1.5x 35.6962
2x 88.0461
dbench improvements
0.5x 3.2428
1x 1.1514
1.5x 5.5071
2x 23.8700
( I will have to restest on ebizzy 1x reression but overall performance
numbers look good).
>> Baseline was 3.14-rc8 without any of the qspin patch series.
>>
>
> Does the baseline have PV ticketlock or without any PV support?
baseline had PV ticketlock enabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists