[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y4zfi92x.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:29:42 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, acme@...stprotocols.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jolsa@...hat.com,
jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com, peterz@...radead.org,
eranian@...gle.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Richard Fowles <rfowles@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15 V3] perf c2c: Shared data analyser
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> writes:
>
> Well, I'm not sure ;-) Yes, the c2c is a complex tool which might
> deserve an own command, but the functionality is very similar and I
> guess there's something to share between them.
They work very differently. I don't see a lot of potential
for sharing.
perf mem is basically just a way to annotate normal samples slightly
with addresses, while c2c is fundamentally address driven.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists