linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: intel-mid: add watchdog platform code for Merrifield

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140409151822.GA21864@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:18:22 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Cc:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>, wim@...ana.be,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: intel-mid: add watchdog platform code for
 Merrifield

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
> > > Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit systems with some special hardware bases.
> > > So, how to use otherwise?
> > 
> > There isn't any fundamental thing tying device tree to a given
> > architecture or 32bitness, it's just that sane PC architectures use ACPI
> > to enumerate devices, and/or have a discoverable bus architecture.
> > 
> > Some of the phones don't so this now becoems a point of consideration. In
> > fact it's already also used on CE4100 (which is an embedded media SoC
> > found in some TV devices and set-top boxes) and on the OLPC (One laptop
> > per child). There is no intrinsic reason it couldn't be used in other x86
> > special cases.
> > 
> > If its PC shaped however it probably has ACPI and ACPI and DT are not a
> > 1:1 mapping. ACPI has method invocations, and various firmware provided
> > interfaces such as the EC, Device tree is better at some other bits.
> 
> Yep, like SPI devices on embedded x86 hardware.
> 
> > Converting the phones to embedded device tree rather than adding a
> > billion little platform files on the other hand seems to me like a
> > no-brainer.
> 
> I found http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/4475. Why didn't that get into mainline?
> 

Isn't that patch set in mainline ?

We are working on a patch set to make DT support on x86 more
widely available. Thierry Reding did some work on it a while ago.
Some of it is upstream, other parts are available in 
	https://github.com/avionic-design/linux/commits/medatom/master

We'll see if and what will be accepted upstream.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/