[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponUhM4kWPLRxSCoLt7pEWT8sjrMSiMU7TNiMFcQxjOSLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:28:31 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mwhitehe@...hat.com,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"# 3.13.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick-sched: replace tick_nohz_active with
tick_nohz_enabled in tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz()
On 9 April 2014 21:11, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> But tick_nohz_active also gets set by tick_setup_sched_timer() which
> looks to be where it should get set. What is the case that this would
> set that variable and tick_setup_sched_timer() would not?
These two are in parallel and only one of these will ever succeed. So,
either tick_setup_sched_timer() or tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() will
set it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists