[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409160108.GU16119@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:01:09 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ulli.kroll@...glemail.com, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:50:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 16:27:11 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > If it's called from ARM code, then \reg will contain a 4-byte aligned
> > address. If it's called from Thumb code, \reg will contain a 2-byte
> > aligned address with bit 0 *always* set.
>
> Right, that is the assumption.
>
> > So, with the code originally quoted above, if the helper is called from
> > thumb code, and CONFIG_CPU_32v4 is enabled, then we end up falling past
> > the moveq to the "b ." and entering an infinite loop.
>
> As Uwe said, that "b ." was not meant to be in the patch used for
> submission, it was to check what goes wrong when running this code
> on ARMv4 -- either crash user space or hang in an infinite loop.
> I forgot what the result of that experiment was.
>
> The trouble is that this code:
>
> .macro usr_ret, reg
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_THUMB
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_32v4
> tst \reg, #3
> moveq pc, \reg
> #endif
> bx \reg
> #else
> mov pc, \reg
> #endif
> .endm
>
> for some reason does the wrong thing running on ARMv4 (fa526) with non-thumb
> user space when both CONFIG_CPU_32v4 and CONFIG_ARM_THUMB are enabled:
> it still tries to do the 'bx' and triggers an invalid opcode exception.
I assume this has been discussed in off-list (maybe on some irc channel
somewhere), because there's nothing on-list apart from these emails...
So, let's repeat the debugging which probably has already occured, but
this time on-list...
It would be useful to see the register state from the undefined
instruction exception. That needs this patch, CONFIG_DEBUG_USER in the
kernel config enabled, and user_debug=1 passed on the kernel command
line.
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 172ee18ff124..abd2fc067736 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_undefinstr(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (user_debug & UDBG_UNDEFINED) {
printk(KERN_INFO "%s (%d): undefined instruction: pc=%p\n",
current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), pc);
+ __show_regs(regs);
dump_instr(KERN_INFO, regs);
}
#endif
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists