linux-kernel - Re: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:15:22 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mwhitehe@...hat.com, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: nohz problem with idle time on old hardware

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:26:51 +0530
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:


> When HRES isn't enabled and NOHZ isn't enabled as well, in that
> case we should stick to the periodic code from tick-common.c and
> the oneshot options of tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() or
> hrtimer_switch_to_hres() shouldn't be used. And so, we still need
> those checks, as per my understanding. :)

The one thing we can agree on is that the current code is wrong :-)

> 
> Lets see what others have for this discussion :)

Yeah, those that actually wrote this code should have a say in this.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/