[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409162040.GA19743@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:20:40 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Neil Greatorex <neil@...boyfat.co.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthew Minter <matthew_minter@...atex.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bus: mvebu-mbus: Avoid setting an undefined window
size
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:11:29AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> OK I just got it by adding two printk() in pci-mvebu.c. Both functions
> mvebu_pcie_handle_iobase_change() and mvebu_pcie_handle_membase_change()
> do pass a size which is in fact a mask (size - 1) and not the real size.
> So the mbus is fed with an incorrect size which is off by one :
Yes, that is right. I tested my patch here and didn't see any problem,
but I realize now that the mbus code is bailing early due to this:
kernel: mvebu_mbus: cannot add window '4:e8', conflicts with another window
Which I've never got around to fixing.. (whole other story there)
Your patch looks fine, and it obviously needs to be sequenced before
mine. (Thomas/Jason C: how do you want to do this?)
Reviewed-By: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
> From de000611015c7490a07ced6e36bfffbfdd136832 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:05:09 +0200
> Subject: pci: mvebu: fix off-by-one in the computed size of the mbus windows
>
> mvebu_pcie_handle_membase_change() and mvebu_pcie_handle_iobase_change()
> compute a window size which is in fact a mask. This size is fed to
> mvebu_mbus_add_window_by_id() which itself subtracts 1 to get the
> mask. So clearly the two functions above are wrong.
Mask isn't the right word, maybe:
mvebu_pcie_handle_membase_change() and
mvebu_pcie_handle_iobase_change() do not correctly compute the window
size. PCI uses an inclusive start/end address pair, which requires a
+1 when converting to size.
This only worked because a bug in the mbus driver allowed it to
silently accept and round up bogus sizes.
Fix this by adding one to the computed size.
Regards,
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists