[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW8xkBFJ5-E04rVhDk+CSubHut+kx3P6cYCn0dMhQdb-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:40:57 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 changes for 3.15
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > maintainers would have no idea that a new syscall has been added.
>>
>> If i386 has the new syscall, scripts/checksyscalls.sh will catch it and
>> inform us about it during our next kernel build.
>>
>> If you add it to x86_64 only, bad luck for anyone else ;-)
>
> Maybe we should change scripts/checksyscalls.sh to check the x86_64
> list of syscalls, and not i386?
>
> It's been a long time since "all the world's an i386" --- these days,
> it's "all the world's an x86_64". :-)
Let the kbuild people (and their employers) fight over it...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists