[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409173233.GA28615@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:32:34 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched: Convert thread_group_cputime() to use
for_each_thread()
On 04/09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > do_each_thread/while_each_thread iterators are deprecated by
> > for_each_thread/for_each_process_thread() APIs.
> >
> > Lets convert the callers in the cputime code accounting. The ultimate
> > goal is to remove the struct task_struct::thread_group field and
> > the corresponding do_each_thread/while_each_thread iterators that are
> > RCU unsafe.
> >
> > It also makes thread_group_cputime() eventually RCU-safe.
>
> this fails to explain how the current code is broken.
while_each_thread(g, t) will loop forever if g exits and removes itself
from ->thread_group. This can happen even if it is the group leader,
de_thread() can do this.
Another problem is that it is used wrongly very often, even if
while_each_thread() was fine people forget to check pid_alive() to ensure
it didn't exit even before we take rcu_read_lock().
for_each_thread(p, t) is always safe. Unless p's task_struct can't go away,
of course.
But there is a difference. Ignoring the bug above
p = g;
do {
printk("pid=%d\n", p->pid);
} while_each_thread(g, p);
always prints at least one pid.
for_each_thread(g, p)
printk("pid=%d\n", p->pid);
can print nothing if g has already exited.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists