linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Return immediately from suspend if ehci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1404091430240.28384-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Return immediately from suspend
 if ehci_suspend fails

On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:

> Patch 'b8efdaf USB: EHCI: add check for wakeup/suspend race'
> adds a check for possible race between suspend and wakeup interrupt,
> and thereby it returns -EBUSY as error code if there's a wakeup
> interrupt.
> So the platform host controller should not proceed further with
> its suspend callback, rather should return immediately to avoid
> powering down the essential things, like phy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> ---
> 
> Based on 'usb-next' branch of Greg's usb tree.
> 
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> index d1d8c47..a4550eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> @@ -212,6 +212,8 @@ static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	rc = ehci_suspend(hcd, do_wakeup);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
>  
>  	if (exynos_ehci->otg)
>  		exynos_ehci->otg->set_host(exynos_ehci->otg, &hcd->self);
> @@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ static int exynos_ehci_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos_ehci->clk);
>  
> -	return rc;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int exynos_ehci_resume(struct device *dev)

The first hunk of this patch is correct, but the second hunk isn't 
needed.  A similar remark is true for the ehci-platform patch.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/