[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409191454.GQ6529@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:14:54 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
"m.chehab@...sung.com" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
"mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp" <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ie31200_edac: Add driver
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:57:19PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> Right, so maybe the fact that its a desktop chipset means that it
> behaves differently and doesn't raise MCEs on memory errors. We have a
> bunch of these processors and we haven't yet seen an MCE raised on a
> memory error.
This can't be - an uncorrectable error will have to generate a machine
check exception if consumed - there's no other option.
Can you do
rdmsr 0x179
rdmsr 0x17b
and paste the results here?
> The reason I went with ie31200 is that afaiu the memory controller hub
> is integrated into the cpu. Another alternative might be ie312xx?
Yeah, if Tony doesn't come up with something more official about that
MCH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists