[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140409024700.702797305@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 22:47:00 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH RT 0/2] rwsem-rt: Make rwsem rt closer to mainline
Looking at mainline's down_read() I noticed that reader locks of rwsems
are not made to nest. In fact, they should not. Although, it may seem
fine if a down_read() nests as multiple readers can have the lock,
rwsems are fair locks. That is, if a writer were to block on a rwsem
while readers have the lock, a new reader will also block. If a reader
were to try to take the lock again while a writer was waiting, it
would block, and cause a deadlock as it has the lock its trying
to grab and wont let it go as the writer is waiting.
I also found that the rt_mutex_init() is identical in the two places
it is defined in rtmutex.h.
Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (2):
rwsem-rt: Do not allow readers to nest
rtmutex: Remove duplicate rt_mutex_init()
----
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 12 +++---------
include/linux/rwsem_rt.h | 1 -
kernel/rt.c | 37 ++++++++-----------------------------
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists