[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53465669.80701@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 13:59:29 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm: move FAULT_AROUND_ORDER to arch/
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 09:18 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 04/09/2014 01:20 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> This still misses out on Ben's objection that its impossible to get this
>> right at compile time for many kernels, since they can boot and run on
>> many different subarchs.
>
> Completely agree. The Kconfig-time stuff should probably just be a knob
> to turn it off completely, if anything.
>
ok. Here is my thought. So to address Ben's concern, it would be better
to have this as a variable with a default value (and the platform can
override ride it). And a mm/Kconfig to disable it?
Kindly let me know whether this will work.
Thanks for review comments.
With regards
Maddy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists