| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1397121514.25199.91.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:18:34 +0800
From: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, toshi.kani@...com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] Suppress a device hot remove related lockdep warning
I noticed following lockdep warning when trying acpi hot-remove cpus:
[84154.204080] ======================================================
[84154.204080] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[84154.204080] 3.14.0-next-20140408+ #24 Tainted: G W
[84154.204080] -------------------------------------------------------
[84154.204080] bash/777 is trying to acquire lock:
[84154.204080] (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810664a7>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x17/0x20
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] but task is already holding lock:
[84154.213203] (s_active#79){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff81256e14>] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x190
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[84154.213203]
-> #3 (s_active#79){++++.+}:
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810c408b>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0x1d0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff812552e0>] __kernfs_remove+0x250/0x310
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81256470>] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xc0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81257af5>] sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x15/0x20
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813df339>] device_remove_file+0x19/0x20
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813dff33>] device_remove_attrs+0x33/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e00a7>] device_del+0x127/0x1c0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e0162>] device_unregister+0x22/0x60
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e66de>] unregister_cpu+0x1e/0x40
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81009a33>] arch_unregister_cpu+0x23/0x30
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8136f619>] acpi_processor_remove+0x8d/0xb2
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8136cfff>] acpi_bus_trim+0x5a/0x8d
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8136ec3b>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1a8/0x3ec
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81369002>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1f/0x2b
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8108754b>] process_one_work+0x1eb/0x6b0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81087e9b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x370
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81090324>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815d2f2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[84154.213203]
-> #2 (cpu_hotplug.lock#2){+.+.+.}:
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810c408b>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0x1d0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815c7700>] mutex_lock_nested+0x50/0x3c0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810665bf>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x4f/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8106666f>] _cpu_up+0x3f/0x160
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810667f9>] cpu_up+0x69/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81b18f14>] smp_init+0x60/0x8c
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81b00fd8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x126/0x23b
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815b4a3e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815d2f2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[84154.213203]
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug.lock){++++++}:
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810c408b>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0x1d0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810665b1>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x41/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff8106666f>] _cpu_up+0x3f/0x160
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810667f9>] cpu_up+0x69/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81b18f14>] smp_init+0x60/0x8c
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81b00fd8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x126/0x23b
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815b4a3e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815d2f2c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[84154.213203]
-> #0 (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}:
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810c397a>] __lock_acquire+0x1f2a/0x1f60
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810c408b>] lock_acquire+0x9b/0x1d0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815c7700>] mutex_lock_nested+0x50/0x3c0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff810664a7>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x17/0x20
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815b582d>] cpu_down+0x1d/0x50
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e63b4>] cpu_subsys_offline+0x14/0x20
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e145d>] device_offline+0xad/0xd0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813e1562>] online_store+0x42/0x80
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff813deab8>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81257bb9>] sysfs_kf_write+0x49/0x60
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff81256e39>] kernfs_fop_write+0x109/0x190
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff811d15be>] vfs_write+0xbe/0x1c0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff811d1a52>] SyS_write+0x52/0xb0
[84154.213203] [<ffffffff815d3162>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] other info that might help us debug this:
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] Chain exists of:
cpu_add_remove_lock --> cpu_hotplug.lock#2 --> s_active#79
[84154.213203] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] CPU0 CPU1
[84154.213203] ---- ----
[84154.213203] lock(s_active#79);
[84154.213203] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock#2);
[84154.213203] lock(s_active#79);
[84154.213203] lock(cpu_add_remove_lock);
[84154.213203]
[84154.213203] *** DEADLOCK ***
.............
The deadlock itself seems already fixed in commit 5e33bc41.
This patch uses DEVICE_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP for "online" attr to suppress
this lockdep warning. But I'm a little afraid it might also hide
(future) potential real dead lock scenarios?
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/base/core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 0dd6528..98e3e09 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -452,7 +452,9 @@ static ssize_t online_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
unlock_device_hotplug();
return ret < 0 ? ret : count;
}
-static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(online);
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(online, (S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO),
+ online_show, online_store);
int device_add_groups(struct device *dev, const struct attribute_group **groups)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists