[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1397134442.31272.38.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 08:54:02 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: efi: add EFI stub
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:20 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > +config EFI
> > + bool "UEFI firmware support"
> > + depends on OF
>
> I note we're not depending on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN here, and it looks like
> the implementation is not endian-clean (I've pointed out a few issues
> below).
>
> We need to fix that up for CPU_BIG_ENDIAN. For the moment we could
> depend on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN which would at least to make it clear we don't
> support EFI && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN yet. The commit message should be updated
> to mention that.
>
Yes, the !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN was there at one point but got lost along
the way. It may be best to put it back for now, but I'll take a
stab at getting the stub part sorted out based on your comments.
Full runtime services will be trickier and need a followup patch in
the future after the initial patch series goes in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists