[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140410090452.6b7677fc@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:04:52 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] tracing: syscall_*regfunc() can race with
copy_process()
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:42 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> syscall_regfunc() and syscall_unregfunc() should set/clear
> TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT system-wide, but do_each_thread() can race
> with copy_process() and miss the new child which was not added to
> init_task.tasks list yet.
>
> Change copy_process() to update the child's TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT
> under tasklist.
>
> While at it,
>
> - remove _irqsafe from syscall_regfunc/syscall_unregfunc,
> read_lock(tasklist) doesn't need to disable irqs.
>
> - change syscall_unregfunc() to check PF_KTHREAD to skip
> the kernel threads, ->mm != NULL is the common mistake.
>
> Note: probably this check should be simply removed, needs
> another patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
BTW, how important is this fix? Something we should aim for the current
merge window? stable? Or can it wait till 3.16?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists