| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1397151302.4757.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:35:02 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, "backports@...r.kernel.org" <backports@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com> Subject: Re: Bumping required kernels to 3.0 for Linux backports ? On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 19:26 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2014-04-10 19:16, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 11:18 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > >> I'm looking forward to getting rid of patches for older kernels that > >> often get in the way when using various wireless-testing versions ;) > > > > What do you frequently get conflicts on? I haven't seen any for a long > > time. > I don't remember. It was in different areas every time I did an update. I had a lot of those, but we've converted so much to spatches now that it hasn't been a concern in a long time (the netlink nlpid/pid thing was the one that conflicted most for me, but it's long gone) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists