[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4Qa8N0G8whyW5OWQS4x9=CVOF0PpcLhDi4j3wGTHX0==w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:57:17 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ryan Lortie <desrt@...rt.ca>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] File Sealing & memfd_create()
Hi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> Would it make sense for the initial mode on a memfd inode to be 000?
> Anyone who finds this to be problematic could use fchmod to fix it.
memfd_create() should be subject to umask() just like anything else.
That should solve any possible race here, right?
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists