lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140410032314.005473908@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  9 Apr 2014 20:23:50 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 114/134] hwmon: (coretemp) Improve support for TjMax detection on Atom CPUs

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

commit 41e58a1f2b90c88d94b4bd84beb9927a4c2704e9 upstream.

Atom CPUs don't have a register to retrieve TjMax. Detection so far was
incomplete. Use the X86 model ID to improve it.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -191,6 +191,24 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *
 	return tdata->valid ? sprintf(buf, "%d\n", tdata->temp) : -EAGAIN;
 }
 
+struct tjmax {
+	char const *id;
+	int tjmax;
+};
+
+static struct tjmax __cpuinitconst tjmax_table[] = {
+	{ "CPU D410", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU D425", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU D510", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU D525", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU N450", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU N455", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU N470", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU N475", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU  230", 100000 },
+	{ "CPU  330", 125000 },
+};
+
 static int __cpuinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id,
 				  struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -202,6 +220,13 @@ static int __cpuinit adjust_tjmax(struct
 	int err;
 	u32 eax, edx;
 	struct pci_dev *host_bridge;
+	int i;
+
+	/* explicit tjmax table entries override heuristics */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tjmax_table); i++) {
+		if (strstr(c->x86_model_id, tjmax_table[i].id))
+			return tjmax_table[i].tjmax;
+	}
 
 	/* Early chips have no MSR for TjMax */
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ