[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140411061202.GA8321@type>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:12:02 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jslaby@...e.cz,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evan Broder <evan@...oder.net>,
Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Niels de Vos <devos@...oraproject.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...esi-usa.com>, blogic@...nwrt.org,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Route keyboard LEDs through the generic LEDs layer.
Hello,
I'm sorry this went out with a few mistakes.
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 09 Apr 2014 01:33:06 +0200, a écrit :
> Dmitry Torokhov, le Tue 08 Apr 2014 01:39:40 -0700, a écrit :
> > It is not about the VT, I am talking about pure input core. If I
> > repurpose CapsLock LED for my WiFi indicator I do not want to go into
> > other programs and teach them that they should stay away from trying to
> > control this LED.
>
> Err, but even without talking about repurposing Capslock LED for WiFi...
> How is managed the conflict between the normal capslock behavior and
> other programs' action on the underlying input device? I don't think
> this patch does not introduce the problem.
I of course meant "I don't think this patch introduces the problem".
> How to decide which one to prioritize?
>
> Is it just because console-setup happens to repurpose the capslock LED
> key that applications should suddenly not have capslock LED control
> at all? That's contradictory with the use case you have given.
Oops, not the use case you have given, but a typical use-case of wanting
to use a program which does nice things with the capslock LED, and then
having to teach console-setup not to repurpose the capslock LED.
> That
> leads me into believing that we should not try to push a hard rule, and
> just let the user manage what accesses it. We could indeed make the VT
> always take priority, but then that would probably break some existing
> applications.
Such as the example above, with the capslock LED.
Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists