[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140411132412.2ef89a3b@mschwide>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:24:12 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
> #define __NR_finit_module 344
> #define __NR_sched_setattr 345
> #define __NR_sched_getattr 346
> -#define NR_syscalls 345
> +#define NR_syscalls 347
>
> /*
> * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some
Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly?
I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have
added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists