[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvqoiZ6ZDF78ptvDLdav4AAcLfYpji6c-_rqu4-BoGXTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:52:08 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] s390: NR_syscalls fix
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:25:47 +0200
> Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
>> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> index 5eb5c9ddb120..57194268fe63 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
>> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
>> #define __NR_finit_module 344
>> #define __NR_sched_setattr 345
>> #define __NR_sched_getattr 346
>> -#define NR_syscalls 345
>> +#define NR_syscalls 347
>>
>> /*
>> * There are some system calls that are not present on 64 bit, some
>
> Is this patch part of a patch series that does upstream directly?
> I am asking because Heiko already created a patch for this and we have
> added it to the linux-s390:fixes branch for upstream integration.
No, I don't mean to upstream directly. So you can just drop my submission...
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists