[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5347E475.4020009@osadl.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:47:49 +0200
From: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RT V3] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems
Hi Steven,
> [..] I added Carsten to the Cc, so I'll post the entire change log
> of v1 here again.
I've been listening and testing boxes all the time ...
> [..] If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very
> happy if you could test this patch against the unpatched version of
> -rt.
Three machines
- an X32 x86_64 (AMD Opteron 6272 @2100 MHz) at rack #1/slot #1,
- an X4x2 x86_64 (Intel i7-2600K @3400 MHz) at rack #4/slot #6, and
- an X4 ARM (i.MX6 Quad @996 MHz) at rack #8/slot #7
are running a v3-patched 3.12.15-rt25 kernel now. I'll equip more
machines later.
What I can say so far is:
- No evidence for any regression, no crashes
- Performance certainly at least as good as unpatched, probably better
I'll do more tests and come back with more precise performance
comparison data.
Thanks,
-Carsten.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists