[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5347451C.4060106@amacapital.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:27:56 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>
CC: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] shm: add sealing API
On 04/10/2014 05:22 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com> wrote:
>> For O_DIRECT the kernel pins the submitted pages in memory for DMA by
>> incrementing the page reference counts when the I/O is submitted,
>> allowing the pages to be modified by DMA even if they are no longer
>> mapped in the address space of the process. This is different from a
>> regular read(), which uses the CPU to copy the data and will fail if the
>> pages are not mapped.
>
> Can you please provide an example code-path? For instance,
> file_read_actor() does not pin any pages but only keeps the user-space
> address and resolves it once it has data to write.
This may be an issue for anything in the kernel that calls
get_user_pages and holds onto the result at any time that mmap_sem isn't
held.
I don't know exactly what does that, but RDMA comes to mind. So does
(ugh!) vmsplice, although I suspect that vmsplice doesn't write.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists