lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140411150724.GI18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:07:25 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	"Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, jason.low2@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cred_guard_mutex vs seq_file::lock [was: Re: 3.14.0+/x86:
 lockdep and mutexes not getting along]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:50:27PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> > Al, David, any bright ideas on how to best fix this?
> 
> Have the seq_xxx() code throw an error if current->in_execve is true.  I can't
> think of any circumstance where execve() should be reading anything that uses
> seq_xxx().

*cringe*

I don't like it.  That really should be a responsiblity of specific ->show();
"I'm going to take that mutex, bugger off if we are in execve()" makes a lot
more sense than having e.g. seq_read() care of that.  IOW, I would very
much prefer the patch you've sent last week.

And yes, it might leave lockdep false positives, but that's better dealt with
by annotating the sucker ("this guy has a separate lockdep class for its
->lock").  E.g. by splitting proc_single_file_operations in two and having
the one used for those files do lockdep_set_class() in its ->open().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ