lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:44:24 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	kgene.kim@...sung.com, t.figa@...sung.com,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	inki.dae@...sung.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
	hyunhee.kim@...sung.com, yj44.cho@...sung.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] ARM: EXYNOS: Support secondary CPU boot of
 Exynos4212

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:37:15PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> From: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> 
> This patch fix the offset of CPU boot address and change parameter of smc call
> of SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT command for Exynos4212.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> index 932129e..91a911d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  
>  #include <mach/map.h>
>  
> +#include <plat/cpu.h>
> +
>  #include "smc.h"
>  
>  static int exynos_do_idle(void)
> @@ -28,14 +30,22 @@ static int exynos_do_idle(void)
>  
>  static int exynos_cpu_boot(int cpu)
>  {
> -	exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);
> +	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> +		exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, 0, 0, 0);
> +	else
> +		exynos_smc(SMC_CMD_CPU1BOOT, cpu, 0, 0);

	/* <explain why you need this special case on 4212> */
	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
		cpu = 0;

...and then do the call as before.


>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr)
>  {
> -	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c + 4*cpu;
> +	void __iomem *boot_reg = S5P_VA_SYSRAM_NS + 0x1c;
>  
> +	if (soc_is_exynos4212())
> +		goto out;
> +	else
> +		boot_reg += 4*cpu;

	if (!soc_is_exynos4212())
		boot_reg += 4 * cpu;

That way you avoid a goto, especially since the "goto out" isn't actually
an "out", it's still doing stuff at the end of the funciton.

> +out:
>  	__raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ