[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140411160312.GB31676@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:03:12 -0700
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [crypto:master 60/60]
arch/x86/crypto/ghash-clmulni-intel_glue.c:71:25: sparse: cast to restricted
__be64
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:11:19AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Greg,
>
> This pertains to commit 8ceee72808d1 (crypto: ghash-clmulni-intel -
> use C implementation for setkey()) that has been pulled by Linus
> during the current merge window.
>
> It is missing two things:
> - a cc to stable annotation
> - a fix for the sparse warning below (change cast from __be64 to __force __be64)
>
> The reason for cc'ing stable on this patch is that it fixes a
> potential data corruption issue where the ghash setkey() method uses
> SSE registers without calling kernel_fpu_begin() first. This issue was
> introduced by 0e1227d356e9b (crypto: ghash - Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated
> implementation).
>
> So how would you like to proceed with this? Should I propose a new
> patch somewhere?
No problem, I'll apply this as-is. But it doesn't apply to the
3.4-stable tree cleanly, can you send me a backported version if it's
still needed there as well?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists