linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13 11/65] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140411160959.280925799@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:10:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 11/65] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

3.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit de1443916791d75fdd26becb116898277bb0273f ]

Some applications didn't expect recvmsg() on a non blocking socket
could return -EINTR. This possibility was added as a side effect
of commit b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in
unix recv routines").

To hit this bug, you need to be a bit unlucky, as the u->readlock
mutex is usually held for very small periods.

Fixes: b3ca9b02b00704 ("net: fix multithreaded signal handling in unix recv routines")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1785,8 +1785,11 @@ static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct kio
 		goto out;
 
 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
-	if (err) {
-		err = sock_intr_errno(sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock));
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		/* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
+		 * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
+		 */
+		err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -1911,6 +1914,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
 	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
 	struct sockaddr_un *sunaddr = msg->msg_name;
 	int copied = 0;
+	int noblock = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT;
 	int check_creds = 0;
 	int target;
 	int err = 0;
@@ -1926,7 +1930,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
 		goto out;
 
 	target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, flags&MSG_WAITALL, size);
-	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags&MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, noblock);
 
 	/* Lock the socket to prevent queue disordering
 	 * while sleeps in memcpy_tomsg
@@ -1938,8 +1942,11 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct ki
 	}
 
 	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
-	if (err) {
-		err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		/* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
+		 * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
+		 */
+		err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
 		goto out;
 	}
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/