[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53481FD5.9000405@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:01:09 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, wdauchy@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, tony.luck@...el.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI
storms
On 04/02/2014 12:55 AM, tip-bot for Chen, Gong wrote:
> @@ -614,6 +618,8 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
> if (!(m.status & MCI_STATUS_VAL))
> continue;
>
> + v = &get_cpu_var(mce_polled_error);
> + set_bit(0, v);
> /*
> * Uncorrected or signalled events are handled by the exception
> * handler when it is enabled, so don't process those here.
> @@ -1278,10 +1284,18 @@ static unsigned long mce_adjust_timer_default(unsigned long interval)
> static unsigned long (*mce_adjust_timer)(unsigned long interval) =
> mce_adjust_timer_default;
>
> +static int cmc_error_seen(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long *v = &__get_cpu_var(mce_polled_error);
> +
> + return test_and_clear_bit(0, v);
> +}
> +
Please use this_cpu_*() whereever possible instead of __get_cpu_var().
Since this is not actually a bitmask this_cpu_xchg() can be used at the end.
In fact, using set_bit() is completely wasteful.
I'll push this onward since it is a bit late, but please submit a
cleanup patch.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists