linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 21/41] ipmr: fix mfc notification flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140411160934.336771385@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:09:52 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 21/41] ipmr: fix mfc notification flags

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>

[ Upstream commit 65886f439ab0fdc2dff20d1fa87afb98c6717472 ]

Commit 8cd3ac9f9b7b ("ipmr: advertise new mfc entries via rtnl") reuses the
function ipmr_fill_mroute() to notify mfc events.
But this function was used only for dump and thus was always setting the
flag NLM_F_MULTI, which is wrong in case of a single notification.

Libraries like libnl will wait forever for NLMSG_DONE.

CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/ipmr.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -2255,13 +2255,14 @@ int ipmr_get_route(struct net *net, stru
 }
 
 static int ipmr_fill_mroute(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
-			    u32 portid, u32 seq, struct mfc_cache *c, int cmd)
+			    u32 portid, u32 seq, struct mfc_cache *c, int cmd,
+			    int flags)
 {
 	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
 	struct rtmsg *rtm;
 	int err;
 
-	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, cmd, sizeof(*rtm), NLM_F_MULTI);
+	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, cmd, sizeof(*rtm), flags);
 	if (nlh == NULL)
 		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
@@ -2329,7 +2330,7 @@ static void mroute_netlink_event(struct
 	if (skb == NULL)
 		goto errout;
 
-	err = ipmr_fill_mroute(mrt, skb, 0, 0, mfc, cmd);
+	err = ipmr_fill_mroute(mrt, skb, 0, 0, mfc, cmd, 0);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto errout;
 
@@ -2368,7 +2369,8 @@ static int ipmr_rtm_dumproute(struct sk_
 				if (ipmr_fill_mroute(mrt, skb,
 						     NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 						     cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
-						     mfc, RTM_NEWROUTE) < 0)
+						     mfc, RTM_NEWROUTE,
+						     NLM_F_MULTI) < 0)
 					goto done;
 next_entry:
 				e++;
@@ -2382,7 +2384,8 @@ next_entry:
 			if (ipmr_fill_mroute(mrt, skb,
 					     NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid,
 					     cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
-					     mfc, RTM_NEWROUTE) < 0) {
+					     mfc, RTM_NEWROUTE,
+					     NLM_F_MULTI) < 0) {
 				spin_unlock_bh(&mfc_unres_lock);
 				goto done;
 			}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/