[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFcVECL-G_JPZXmzBLT_cFo3vmjYZd8xGFf-7Vv2uXWa9-O37Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 08:39:54 +0530
From: Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
michals@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: core: Increase timeout value
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:20:29PM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote:
>
>> Considering acceptable latencies, this timeout can be set to a large
>> value >= 1*HZ typically.
>
>> This patch adds a tolerance of 2000 msec in the core accordingly.
>
> That's too much, it's 2 seconds which gets to be incredibly painful when
> trying to debug problems - if you're sitting there waiting for a driver
> to time out some operations (and it may be more than one of them) so you
> can look at the diagnostics it can be quite aggrivating. That's why the
> delays are related to the expected runtime for the operation. Something
> like double the expected runtime plus something in the 100ms or so range
> perhaps?
>
OK.
> Ideally we'd use the actual speed the device set rather than the
> requested one too, that'd help.
How would you propose to do that - driver should write back actual speed set
to xfer->speed_hz?
Regards,
Harini
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists