[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5348493C.8040408@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:57:48 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
<vinod.koul@...el.com>, <nsekhar@...com>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
<mporter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/14] dma: edma: Simplify direction configuration
in edma_config_pset()
On 04/11/2014 01:39 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 01:40 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On 04/01/2014 08:06 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> We only support DEV_TO_MEM or MEM_TO_DEV directions with edma driver and the
>>> check for the direction has been already done in the function calling
>>> edma_config_pset().
>>> The error reporting is redundant and also the "else if ()" can be removed.
>>>
>>
>> NAK. Please don't do this. I have been working on MEM_TO_MEM support as
>> well so leave it as it is for future.
>
> Sure. It is still valid to say that the error else {} will never going to
> happen since you have the same check in the calling function and they already
> filtered the non implemented direction.
>
That's true. Though the patch removes the else if which would mean more
work later ;)
> I'll leave this out from v3.
Thanks.
Regards,
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists