[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404111513040.17724@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 15:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>, drepper@...il.com,
anatol.pomozov@...il.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base/node.c: export physical address range of
given node (Re: NUMA node information for pages)
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > So? Who cares if there are non-addressable holes in part of the span?
> > Ulrich, correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you're looking for just a
> > address-to-nodeid mapping (or pfn-to-nodeid mapping) and aren't actually
> > expecting that there are no holes in a node for things like acpi or I/O or
> > reserved memory.
> ...
> > I think trying to represent holes and handling different memory models and
> > hotplug in special ways is complete overkill.
>
> This isn't just about memory hotplug or different memory models. There
> are systems out there today, in production, that have layouts like this:
>
> |------Node0-----|
> |------Node1-----|
>
> and this:
>
> |------Node0-----|
> |-Node1-|
>
What additional information, in your opinion, can we export to assist
userspace in making this determination that $address is on $nid?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists