lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53496FAC.5030306@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 12 Apr 2014 17:54:04 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 3/6] IIO: core: Modify scan element type

On 09/04/14 01:56, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> The current scan element type uses the following format:
>    [be|le]:[s|u]bits/storagebits[>>shift].
> To specify multiple elements in this type, added a repeat value.
> So new format is:
>    [be|le]:[s|u]bits/storagebits{X[repeat]}[>>shift].
> Here X is specifying how may times, real/storage bits are repeating.
>
> When X is value is 0 or 1, then repeat value is not used in the format,
> and it will be same as existing format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>

I'm happy with this patch as it now stands and will pick up when the rest
of the series is ready to go.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> ---
>   drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   include/linux/iio/iio.h           |  9 +++++++++
>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index e108f2a..afc81b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,16 @@ static ssize_t iio_show_fixed_type(struct device *dev,
>   		type = IIO_BE;
>   #endif
>   	}
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%s:%c%d/%d>>%u\n",
> +	if (this_attr->c->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +		return sprintf(buf, "%s:%c%d/%d{%d[repeat]}>>%u\n",
> +		       iio_endian_prefix[type],
> +		       this_attr->c->scan_type.sign,
> +		       this_attr->c->scan_type.realbits,
> +		       this_attr->c->scan_type.storagebits,
> +		       this_attr->c->scan_type.repeat,
> +		       this_attr->c->scan_type.shift);
> +	else
> +		return sprintf(buf, "%s:%c%d/%d>>%u\n",
>   		       iio_endian_prefix[type],
>   		       this_attr->c->scan_type.sign,
>   		       this_attr->c->scan_type.realbits,
> @@ -474,14 +483,22 @@ static int iio_compute_scan_bytes(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   	for_each_set_bit(i, mask,
>   			 indio_dev->masklength) {
>   		ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, i);
> -		length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> +		if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> +				ch->scan_type.repeat;
> +		else
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>   		bytes = ALIGN(bytes, length);
>   		bytes += length;
>   	}
>   	if (timestamp) {
>   		ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev,
>   					      indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp);
> -		length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
> +		if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> +				ch->scan_type.repeat;
> +		else
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>   		bytes = ALIGN(bytes, length);
>   		bytes += length;
>   	}
> @@ -957,7 +974,11 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   					       indio_dev->masklength,
>   					       in_ind + 1);
>   			ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, in_ind);
> -			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits/8;
> +			if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +				length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> +					ch->scan_type.repeat;
> +			else
> +				length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>   			/* Make sure we are aligned */
>   			in_loc += length;
>   			if (in_loc % length)
> @@ -969,7 +990,11 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   			goto error_clear_mux_table;
>   		}
>   		ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, in_ind);
> -		length = ch->scan_type.storagebits/8;
> +		if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> +				ch->scan_type.repeat;
> +		else
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>   		if (out_loc % length)
>   			out_loc += length - out_loc % length;
>   		if (in_loc % length)
> @@ -990,7 +1015,11 @@ static int iio_buffer_update_demux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>   		}
>   		ch = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev,
>   			indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp);
> -		length = ch->scan_type.storagebits/8;
> +		if (ch->scan_type.repeat > 1)
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8 *
> +				ch->scan_type.repeat;
> +		else
> +			length = ch->scan_type.storagebits / 8;
>   		if (out_loc % length)
>   			out_loc += length - out_loc % length;
>   		if (in_loc % length)
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> index 5629c92..324ae00 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,14 @@ struct iio_event_spec {
>    *			shift:		Shift right by this before masking out
>    *					realbits.
>    *			endianness:	little or big endian
> + *			repeat:		No. of times real/storage bits repeats.
> + *					By default, when repeat is set to 0
> + *					repeat value is treated as 1. When
> + *					repeat value is 0 or 1, then there is
> + *					no change in existing scan element
> + *					type, in sysfs. When set to more than
> + *					1, then the type element in sysfs will
> + *					show repeat value.
>    * @info_mask_separate: What information is to be exported that is specific to
>    *			this channel.
>    * @info_mask_shared_by_type: What information is to be exported that is shared
> @@ -219,6 +227,7 @@ struct iio_chan_spec {
>   		u8	realbits;
>   		u8	storagebits;
>   		u8	shift;
> +		u8	repeat;
>   		enum iio_endian endianness;
>   	} scan_type;
>   	long			info_mask_separate;
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ