linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/8] arm64: Use pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <000001cf57b4$c4b52790$4e1f76b0$@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:40:12 +0900
From:	Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
	Catalin.Marinas@....com, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	sungjinn.chung@...sung.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, ilho215.lee@...sung.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_*
instead of printk.

WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level

Signed-off-by: Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Sungjinn Chung <sungjinn.chung@...sung.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 7ffaddd..0484e81 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void dump_mem(const char *lvl, const char *str, unsigned long bottom,
 	fs = get_fs();
 	set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
 
-	printk("%s%s(0x%016lx to 0x%016lx)\n", lvl, str, bottom, top);
+	pr_emerg("%s%s(0x%016lx to 0x%016lx)\n", lvl, str, bottom, top);
 
 	for (first = bottom & ~31; first < top; first += 32) {
 		unsigned long p;
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void dump_mem(const char *lvl, const char *str, unsigned long bottom,
 					sprintf(str + i * 9, " ????????");
 			}
 		}
-		printk("%s%04lx:%s\n", lvl, first & 0xffff, str);
+		pr_emerg("%s%04lx:%s\n", lvl, first & 0xffff, str);
 	}
 
 	set_fs(fs);
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	printk("%sCode: %s\n", lvl, str);
+	pr_emerg("%sCode: %s\n", lvl, str);
 
 	set_fs(fs);
 }
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 		frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
 	}
 
-	printk("Call trace:\n");
+	pr_emerg("Call trace:\n");
 	while (1) {
 		unsigned long where = frame.pc;
 		int ret;
@@ -328,17 +328,17 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
 
 void __pte_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __pmd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __init trap_init(void)
-- 
1.7.10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/