[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3aspd1h.fsf@wine.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:48:10 +0200
From: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@...ehq.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86-64, modify_ldt: Ban 16-bit segments on 64-bit kernels
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't tested it recently but I do know it has worked on 64-bit
>> kernels. There is no reason for it not to, the only thing not
>> supported in long mode is vm86. 16-bit protected mode is unchanged.
>
> Afaik 64-bit windows doesn't support 16-bit binaries, so I just
> assumed Wine wouldn't do it either on x86-64. Not for any real
> technical reasons, though.
>
> HOWEVER. I'd like to hear something more definitive than "I haven't
> tested recently". The "we don't break user space" is about having
> actual real *users*, not about test programs.
>
> Are there people actually using 16-bit old windows programs under
> wine? That's what matters.
Yes, there is still a significant number of users, and we still
regularly get bug reports about specific 16-bit apps. It would be really
nice if we could continue to support them on x86-64, particularly since
Microsoft doesn't ;-)
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@...ehq.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists