linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: mm: Implement 4 levels of translation tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <000d01cf57c5$d2cd08a0$786719e0$@samsung.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:42:17 +0900
From:	Jungseok Lee <jays.lee@...sung.com>
To:	'Steve Capper' <steve.capper@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
	Catalin.Marinas@....com, 'Marc Zyngier' <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ilho215.lee@...sung.com,
	'linux-samsung-soc' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	sungjinn.chung@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: mm: Implement 4 levels of translation tables

On Monday, April 14, 2014 6:34 PM, Steve Capper wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:24:55PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> > On Monday, April 14, 2014 6:14 PM, Steve Capper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2014 at 04:41:07PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> > > > This patch implements 4 levels of translation tables since 3
> > > > levels of page tables with 4KB pages cannot support 40-bit
> > > > physical address space described in [1] due to the following issue.
> > > >
> > > > It is a restriction that kernel logical memory map with 4KB + 3
> > > > levels
> > > > (0xffffffc000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) cannot cover RAM region
> > > > from 544GB to 1024GB in [1]. Specifically, ARM64 kernel fails to
> > > > create mapping for this region in map_mem function since
> > > > __phys_to_virt for this region reaches to address overflow.
> > > >
> > > > If SoC design follows the document, [1], over 32GB RAM would be
> > > > placed from 544GB. Even 64GB system is supposed to use the region
> > > > from 544GB to 576GB for only 32GB RAM. Naturally, it would reach
> > > > to enable 4 levels of page tables to avoid hacking __virt_to_phys and __phys_to_virt.
> > > >
> > > > However, it is recommended 4 levels of page table should be only
> > > > enabled if memory map is too sparse or there is about 512GB RAM.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > So I thought I'd apply this series and have a play, this patch
> > > doesn't apply cleanly for me, please see below why...
> >
> > This pathset is based on 3.15-rc1.
> 
> Thanks, yes that applies cleanly for me now.

Okay, it sounds good.

> >
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > > > index 0fd5650..0b0b16a 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > > > @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
> > > >  #error KERNEL_RAM_VADDR must start at 0xXXX80000  #endif
> > > >
> > > > -#define SWAPPER_DIR_SIZE	(3 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > > > -#define IDMAP_DIR_SIZE		(2 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > > > +#define SWAPPER_DIR_SIZE	(4 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > > > +#define IDMAP_DIR_SIZE		(3 * PAGE_SIZE)
> > > >
> > > >  	.globl	swapper_pg_dir
> > > >  	.equ	swapper_pg_dir, KERNEL_RAM_VADDR - SWAPPER_DIR_SIZE
> > > > @@ -384,6 +384,20 @@ ENDPROC(__calc_phys_offset)
> > > >  	.endm
> > > >
> > > >  /*
> > > > + * Macro to populate the PUD for the corresponding block entry in
> > > > +the next
> > > > + * level (tbl) for the given virtual address.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Preserves:	pud, tbl, virt
> > > > + * Corrupts:	tmp1, tmp2
> > > > + */
> > > > +	.macro create_pud_entry, pud, tbl, virt, tmp1, tmp2
> > > > +	lsr	\tmp1, \virt, #PUD_SHIFT
> > > > +	and	\tmp1, \tmp1, #PTRS_PER_PUD - 1	// PUD index
> > > > +	orr	\tmp2, \tbl, #3			// PUD entry table type
> > > > +	str	\tmp2, [\pud, \tmp1, lsl #3]
> > > > +	.endm
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > >   * Macro to populate block entries in the page table for the start..end
> > > >   * virtual range (inclusive).
> > > >   *
> > > > @@ -445,10 +459,18 @@ __create_page_tables:
> > > >  	ldr	x3, =KERNEL_START
> > > >  	add	x3, x3, x28			// __pa(KERNEL_START)
> > >
> > > I don't think we have C++ style comments in the kernel. Also, I
> > > can't see any references to =KERNEL_START in arch/arm64/kernel/head.S (from 3.14 down).
> >
> > C++ style comments are prevalent in arch/arm64/kernel/head.S. I've
> > C++ followed the
> > code style written previously.
> 
> Apologies, my mistake, I've been staring at arch/arm too long where @ is used.

It's okay.

Best Regards
Jungseok Lee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/