[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1397482917.11914.128.camel@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:41:57 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@...escale.com>
Cc: vkoul@...radead.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, scottwood@...escale.com,
leo.li@...escale.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] DMA: Freescale: change descriptor release
process for supporting async_tx
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 16:33 +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
> >>> + * hardware channel, subsequent descriptors are either in
> >>> + * process or have not been submitted
> >> Dot at the eol. Check in all comments.
> >
> > Even though I saw there are other comments without the dots, I think
> > it is better to have it.
> > Thanks, all.
> >
> Hmm... think it again, it it really necessary to have it?
> Even I have it in my patch, there are already so many comments exists
> without it.
For my opinion is better to keep style in your patches. Better if it
commonly used style in the driver. But comment against comments is
really minor thing.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists