[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140414161359.GD29351@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:13:59 +0200
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Greg Price <price@....EDU>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] random: Use DRBG sources
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:49:58AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> [Resent because I forgot to email lkml. This also surreptitiously
> fixes a silly typo on a patch description.]
>
> This is my attempt to come up with a workable way to use so-called
> entropy sources like a TPM to feed /dev/urandom.
Ahem, The TPM RNGs are true HWRNGs, but they are very limited.
Their main purpose is to generate enough bits so that the TPM
can generate a genuine key pair after a few seconds.
Why do you want to put those valuable true random bits into urandom?
> Arguably we should be feeding the input pool as well, but if the
Yes.
> /dev/random algorithm is correct, this shouldn't matter. I don't want
> sensible use of TPMs for /dev/urandom to block on a long debate about
> /dev/random, so these patches have no effect on /dev/random.
That confuses me a bit.
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists