[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140414162451.GE29351@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:24:51 +0200
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
ingo.tuchscherer@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hans-Georg Markgraf <MGRF@...ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/03]: hwrng: an in-kernel rngd
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:09:14AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I think the default should be zero, so each hwrng driver maintainer would have to consider what guarantees that particular driver can give. If anything 50% ought to be the maximum.
Repost of v4 just for patch 03/03 is on its way then, defaulting to 0
(off), which happens to be the old behaviour, which I think I've also
expressed my sympathy for already.
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists