[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <74d448a200afd0424fb185e2fb2ac5c31fd6b205.1397492345.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:44 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, Arvind.Chauhan@....com,
linaro-networking@...aro.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/38] tick-sched: no need to recheck cpu_online() in can_stop_idle_tick()
We have already checked if 'cpu' is online or not and so don't need to recheck
it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 9cbba513..c81b6cf 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
if (need_resched())
return false;
- if (unlikely(local_softirq_pending() && cpu_online(cpu))) {
+ if (unlikely(local_softirq_pending())) {
static int ratelimit;
if (ratelimit < 10 &&
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists