lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <41103d439bc01caa70bab32b3d1e84f48ef000f7.1397492345.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:38 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, Arvind.Chauhan@....com,
	linaro-networking@...aro.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 16/38] tick-common: don't pass cpumask to tick_setup_device()

tick_setup_device() is always passed cpumask of 'cpu', which is also passed as
parameter to this routine. So, just calculate the cpumask(cpu) in
tick_setup_device() instead of passing from every caller.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index c1b3619..c2aa441 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast)
  * Setup the tick device
  */
 static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
-			      struct clock_event_device *newdev, int cpu,
-			      const struct cpumask *cpumask)
+			      struct clock_event_device *newdev, int cpu)
 {
+	const struct cpumask *cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
 	ktime_t next_event;
 	void (*handler)(struct clock_event_device *) = NULL;
 
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void tick_install_replacement(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	clockevents_exchange_device(td->evtdev, newdev);
-	tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu, cpumask_of(cpu));
+	tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu);
 	if (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)
 		tick_oneshot_notify();
 }
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 		curdev = NULL;
 	}
 	clockevents_exchange_device(curdev, newdev);
-	tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu, cpumask_of(cpu));
+	tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu);
 	if (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)
 		tick_oneshot_notify();
 	return;
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ