[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140414.125131.1934050779129550948.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:51:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: david.vrabel@...rix.com
Cc: v.maffione@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] drivers: net: xen-netfront: fix array
initialization bug
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:42:20 +0100
> On 12/04/14 21:51, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@...il.com>
>> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:55:40 +0200
>>
>>> This patch fixes the initialization of an array used in the TX
>>> datapath that was mistakenly initialized together with the
>>> RX datapath arrays. An out of range array access could happen
>>> when RX and TX rings had different sizes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@...il.com>
>>
>> Good catch, applied, thanks.
>
> Thanks. You can queue this for net-next since the Tx and Rx rings are
> the same constant size.
I was able to determine when I reviewed this patch that the size in bytes
of the rings are the same (PAGE_SIZE), but I couldn't ascertain whether
the individual ring entries in the TX ring and RX ring are the same size.
Are they?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists