[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140414.134901.2191404761213317963.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nasa4836@...il.com, jchapman@...alix.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
joe@...ches.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] A panic caused by null pointer dereference aftering
updating to
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:40:04 -0700
> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 13:34 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:12:29 -0700
>>
>> > Hmm, it seems commit 31c70d5956fc l2tp: keep original skb ownership
>> > is the problem.
>> >
>> > ip_queue_xmit() assumes the socket attached to skb is an inet socket.
>>
>> This is similar to the "send over AF_PACKET" issue we were discussing
>> the other week.
>>
>> It seems we need a real resolution to this issue.
>>
>> To recap:
>>
>> 1) We want to charge memory to the top-level socket.
>>
>> 2) However during encapsulations etc. we can end up in IP stack
>> which expects only IP sockets to be attached to skb->sk
>>
>> I suspect that in the short term we may have to bit the bullet and
>> compromise #2, and do flow control via the tunnel's socket.
>
> Or add a sk parameter to ip_queue_xmit(), to break the assumption "sk =
> skb->sk", which happened to be generally true, but is ambiguous for IP
> tunnels.
Yep that would handle the l2tp cases, but vxlan needs something different
since it goes through iptunnel_xmit().
So perhaps as a quick fix we can add an 'sk' arg to both
ip_queue_xmit() and ip_local_out().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists