linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:52:36 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	lizefan@...wei.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup/for-3.15] cgroup: implement unified hierarchy

Hello,

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So this patchset does not *enforce* a single hierarchy? So user space
> can still mount other hierarchies.

Nope, nothing is forced.  Controllers may be moved between unified and
traditional multiple hierarchies.

> How does this work for root's tasks now? Given that task can only be
> in leaf cgroups, that means tasks can't be in / cgroup (If one wants
> to create some cgroups). Does that mean / will be empty and init system
> need to setup things right.

Root is exempt from the restriction.  Root has always been special
anyway.

I'll soon post a document describing the design and restrictions of
unified hierarchy along with an updated version of this patchset.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/