linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/15] wire up renameat2 syscall for various archs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:11:28 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] wire up renameat2 syscall for various archs

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>> This series wires up the recently added renameat2 syscall for archs that are
>> up-to-date in the sense that they appear to support the latest syscalls.  I
>> haven't touched the rest of them..
>>
>> Plus three NR_syscalls miscalculation fixes.
>
> Do you plan to collect acks, and ask Linus to pull this series later, or
> do you want each arch maintainer to take the patches for his/her pet
> architecture?

Whichever works best for you.

>
> Note that I don't plan to send another pull request for 3.15 for m68k,
> unless Something Really Bad happens.

So, if that's okay, I'll send it off to Linus sometime later.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/