[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1397519841-24847-4-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:57:21 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidlohr@...com,
aswin@...com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mm,vmacache: optimize overflow system-wide flushing
For single threaded workloads, we can avoid flushing
and iterating through the entire list of tasks, making
the whole function a lot faster, requiring only a single
atomic read for the mm_users.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
---
mm/vmacache.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmacache.c b/mm/vmacache.c
index e167da2..61c38ae 100644
--- a/mm/vmacache.c
+++ b/mm/vmacache.c
@@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ void vmacache_flush_all(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct task_struct *g, *p;
+ /*
+ * Single threaded tasks need not iterate the entire
+ * list of process. We can avoid the flushing as well
+ * since the mm's seqnum was increased and don't have
+ * to worry about other threads' seqnum. Current's
+ * flush will occur upon the next lookup.
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1)
+ return;
+
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists