linux-kernel - Re: Hardware dependencies in Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140415045334.GB32541@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:53:34 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Hardware dependencies in Kconfig

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:59:11PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> Maybe I'm overly grumpy.  Still, it's frustrating to see Kconfig
> entries that clearly say "blahblah found on foo ARM chip" in the help
> with no "depends on ARM" (not meaning to pick on ARM).  I would like
> to think there is some balance that could be found here.

Yes, that would make me grumpy, perhaps a few developers could be
auditing the new Kconfig items of every kernel around -rc3 timeframe to
ensure that they don't do stuff like this...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/