[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871twztacr.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:44:52 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To: Richard Yao <ryao@...too.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf machine: Search for modules in %s/lib/modules/%s
Hi Richard,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:52:59 -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
> Modules installed outside of the kernel's build system should go into
> "%s/lib/modules/%s/extra", but at present, perf will only look at them
> when they are in "%s/lib/modules/%s/kernel". Lets encourage good
> citizenship by relaxing this requirement to "%s/lib/modules/%s". This
> way open source modules that are out-of-tree have no incentive to start
> populating a directory reserved for in-kernle modules and I can stop hex
> editing my system's perf binary when profiling OSS out-of-tree modules.
But it'll make the perf traverses all the source and build directories
too, right? I don't think it's a right thing to do.
Maybe we can also change stat() in map_groups__set_modules_path_dir() to
lstat() so that it cannot go to unwanted directories in that case. Or
else, just checking "kernel" and "extra" directories will work.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists