linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140415075310.GI11182@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:53:10 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] rework sched_domain topology description

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:56:16PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 11/04/14 10:44, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >This patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset [1].
> >I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
> >thing easier.
> >-configuration of sched_domain topology (this patchset)
> >-update and consolidation of cpu_power
> >-tasks packing algorithm
> >
> >Based on Peter Z's proposal [2][3], this patchset modifies the way to configure
> >the sched_domain level in order to let architectures to add specific level like
> >the current BOOK level or the proposed power gating level for ARM architecture.
> >
> >[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/121
> >[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239
> >[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/449
> 
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> given the discussion we had for v1-v3 and a short boot test of v4:
> 
> For patch 1/5, 4/5, 5/5 on ARM TC2 (heterogeneous dual socket w/o SMT
> machine):
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>

Thanks guys!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/